Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "According to American Academy of Pediatrics Benefits of Circumcision Outweigh Risks"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I have one circ'ed boy and one uncirc'ed. I strongly feel that it's a personal decision... however I strongly lean toward not circumcising. A few issues that I have with the AAPs stance are quoted from the article: [i]Two studies have found that circumcision actually increases the risk of H.I.V. infection among sexually active men and women, the academy noted. Although newborn male circumcision is generally believed to be relatively safe, deaths are not unheard of, and the review noted that “the true incidence of complications after newborn circumcision is unknown.” Significant complications are believed to occur in approximately one in 500 procedures. Botched operations can result in damage or even amputation of parts of the penis, and by one estimate about 117 boys die each year.[/i] 1 in 500 sounds pretty high to me... and their penises are so small and delicate, why risk botching their penis over the very slight risk that they may get AIDS from unprotected sex 18 years in the future? Why risk a botched circumcision just so the boys' penis can look like daddy's? I have some, but no major regrets circumcising my first boy... but I have zero regrets with not circumcising my other boy. Looking like daddy or each other is irrelevant... not quite sure why or when they would compare their penises. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics