Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Lance Armstrong is getting a raw deal"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I just wonder if I am the only one who thinks Lance Armstrong is getting a raw deal. I am prepared to be corrected but as far as I know he has never tested positive for doping, even though the USADA has tested his blood samples over and over. Now, years after his Tour de France is over, they have continued to test and retest and have still found nothing but have decided to ban him and strip him of his titles. He has appealed it and I am sure doing so has cost him money and has had an emotional impact. Yesterday he decided to stop the appeals and the USADA is acting like it is an admission of guilt and even acting like they have proven he was doping. He has been banned for life and his titles will be stripped. I just think this is the epitome of unfair. I am totally opposed to doping but only if it is actually happening. If it isn't, I think an athlete's performance should stand on its own. During the time he is accused of doping, many cyclists were caught and received punishment. But they haven't proven he did anything and he is getting punished too. I just think this whole thing stinks so bad. Am I missing something? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics