Reply to Ryan-Aiken social conservatism and anti-science

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Ryan-Aiken social conservatism and anti-science"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]nutty eastern intellectuals don't even realize that the existence of homosexuals disproves evolution and natural selection as homosexuality would be the first trait eliminated from the gene-pool.[/quote]

Why do you believe this to be the case?
[/quote] lack of sex frequency.[/quote]

I admit that biology is not my strongest subject, so can you explain what you mean by this? I know gay people whose frequency of sex would put most hetros to shame.
[/quote] sodomy isn't sex scientifically.   lol.. you fell into that one[/quote]

So, you agree with President Clinton that he didn't have sex with that woman?
[/quote] I don't recognize that name...if you are referring to the Predator in Chief.  Technically, yes.  the sperm ended up on the dress missing the target for procreation just as  sure as if it was a reservior of reproductive mateial lying dormant in the bowels of an adult male homosapian. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics