Reply to NCAA and the antitrust lawsuits

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "NCAA and the antitrust lawsuits"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The bigger case is the Dartmouth basketball case before the NLRB. If the players win, all mens non-revenue sports (including soccer are gone). Women's sports will exist to the extent needed for title IX compliance [/quote]
Or colleges pay players to play a game and represent/advertise their intuition on television.

There is a loophole. But colleges don't want to do this. [/quote]

At that point why not just privatize the entire thing and let the pro organizations deal with it.[/quote]
I think there's still value for colleges to have teams and play sports.

The problem is that the value of what college can provide and what players represent is out of wack. The one thing you can never get back is time. Young players value is very high at 18 and diminishes as they get older. A degree from a college has a set value that doesn't change. If colleges paid players 100k a year and if they players hard to use that money to pay for school it would all work out. But colleges don't want to do this because this gives players all kinds of other benefits because they're now employees not students.  [/quote]

That could also fix the transfer portal show though.  If they're contracted employees, they can't just hit the market.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics