Reply to How would you interpret this clause re: contractor responsibility for damage?

Forum Index » Home Improvement, Design, and Decorating

Reply to "How would you interpret this clause re: contractor responsibility for damage? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]He’s not paying for the mink coat you said that water damage because the window leaked.

He’s not paying to rebuild the front wall of your house because the window leaked.

He’s not putting you up at the Sagamore Pendry for 10 nights because the windows are drafty.

He’s not paying to rebuild the front wall of your house because upon opening it he discovered it’s nothing but Legos and popsicle sticks.

None of his language in the fine print would get him out of liability in the event of a defect in workmanship, there’s no signing that away, as you collect your estimates you will find very similar wording if not exactly that wording on the others; if you don’t see it then the contractors don’t care, have no business skills or don’t have a pot to p in so it doesn’t matter anyway.

In the event of an issue you call your insurance company, your insurance company makes you whole then subrogates the claim onto the contractor either via a direct demand or a lawsuit.

If the window installer has a fairly prominent online presence with lots of reviews they would never allow an unhappy customer, I wouldn’t worry about it and I would just buy the windows.  
[/quote]
LOL at the window company shill.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics