Reply to Issue polls I would like to see

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Issue polls I would like to see"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It is completely understandable that people disapprove of Biden, but it blows my mind that so many people would prefer Trump when a lot of the issues where Biden is bad, Trump is far worse.

But perhaps I’m just flat out wrong and in the minority, and America is truly a right-leaning country. For this reason, I’m curious as to how Americans would answer these questions:

1. Do you attribute lingering inflation (high grocery/consumer goods prices) to corporate greed or to government spending?

2. Do you think that people earning $400K or more should be taxed less, or more?

3. Do you think we should be aiding Israel less/applying conditions, or should we keep supporting Israel?

4. Do you support the negotiated Border proposal or do you oppose it? (The thought behind the question is if you disapprove of Biden on the border, would you have agreed to the bipartisan border bill or would you have agreed with Republicans who try to block it)

5. Should the US invest more (this means gov spending) in critical infrastructure and apply more regulations (to prevent things like train derailments) or less?

Knowing the answers to these questions would help a lot more than just hearing about blanket disapproval of Biden, e.g “Biden is and on the border” “Biden is bad on inflation” “Biden is bad on Israel/Gaza war” “Biden didn’t care about the East Palestine train derailment” etc. 
It just seems that so many of the harshest criticisms of Biden are things for which Trump has no solutions or would actively make the problem worse. [/quote]

This is a silly leftists push poll.

The wealthy already pay way more than everyone else.  Way way more.  Explain who pays what first and then poll away.

More infrastructure, absolutely, but can the union driven bloat on every project as well as the other huge consulting requirements and fees that drive up spending costs.

How about instead of the bs border negotiation, a constitutional change on numbers, resources, etc.  immigration is that big a deal so it should be elevated and left at that.  No more bs on that one.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics