Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Middle school lottery "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Students receiving certain services (FARMS, EML/ESOL, 504, IEP) have had an allowance to qualify with what appears to be a 70th percentile locally normed MAP score instead of 85th.[/quote] OP, ignore this. It’s not true. They say that they take these things into account but in no way have they confirmed a specific lower percentile and I know several people with kids with IEPs and 504 plans who were well about 85th percentile nationally and didn’t get in the pool (assuming that 85th is way above 70th locally in a medium poverty school)[/quote] There was a discussion about the lower cutoff for those receiving services just a short while back: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1178989.page#26604725 This presentation to the BOE shows that the adjustment for the CES magnet lottery pool is to 70%. https://www2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/siteassets/district/boe/meetings/memorandum/09/uploadedfiles/boe/meetings/memorandum/230119-ap-capstone-magnet-prog-12-06-2022-01-c-d-e-bd.pdf The slides also show MS criteria-based magmet lottery pools are shown to be constructed in essentially the same exact way (As, reading level, 85th %ile locally normed for MAP). They say a lower threshold is used. That lower threshold for MS magnets is not specified in the presentation as it it with CES. But the parallels are so direct as to make 70th a very reasonable guess. Until MCPS opens up and specifies something else, that is. The usual reply to this from posters disputing this, here, is, nearly literally, "No, it's not," with nothing supporting that point of view. Happy to be shown something different -- I have no intention, here, besides making the information available to the best of my understanding.[/quote] Your guess is a guess. It’s not even a likely guess. Next time you present data as fact when it’s actually a guess please make clear that it’s a guess. I have direct experience in it not being accurate based on who does and does not get selected, so I know your guess is wrong, but go ahead and make that guess so long as you explain it is one.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics