Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "American Focus on Suburbs Leading to Large Houses"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]As someone who has lived abroad in several countries (not from here), I always find it difficult to understand the focus of Americans on Suburbs. You see these massive houses in what I personally would categorize as "middle of nowhere" (especially when we expand to the rest of US, DMV area tbh is very walkable in my view be it DC, N Arlington, or Bethesda, to name a few), where there are no walkable areas (either no sidewalks or nothing to do in a walkable distance), where you have to drive for a while just to get anywhere. Always confused me, why do people here always try to escape to suburbs where you, realistically, don't have much to do and (as I see it) compensate for that by having a large house. Would it not be better to have a smaller property (say instead of 5k Sq ft, 2k Sq ft) but live in an actual city where you can easily get to places and have things to do? Maybe it's my age or my past experience, but just does not add up to me. Having lived in Europe (among other places), it was amazing to be able to exit my place and be close to the action, have restaurants, shopping spots, or nice places to be easily get to. In an ideal world you would have both a large place and be close to everything, but let's discount this option. Why do so many people here choose to move far to get a massive place rather than staying closer but smaller (assuming that say schools are comparable). Would you not rather live in a modestly size 2k TH rather than super far in a larger place? [/quote] I can’t speak to the appeal of larger houses—for me, the appeal of the suburbs is actually larger lots. [b]As a practical matter, I don’t have much interest in “being close to the action”. I want a big yard to play with the kids, a place to garden, mature trees and quiet places to sit and read, a pool to swim in, no neighbors in earshot, etc., etc.[/b] I think there’s also a cultural aspect to this—part of America’s heritage is the relative availability of land for people who couldn’t own in their country of origin (obviously, mostly only available to white people). The suburban lot is an echo of this heritage.[/quote] Exactly this. Also, not everyone desires to be in the middle of “action” and concrete. I like greenery, nature around me and if I can have it within a reasonable commute then that’s what I am going for. I don’t care for walk ability.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics