Reply to Fertility question

Forum Index » Infertility Support and Discussion

Reply to "Fertility question"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It’s irrelevant. What’s important is you. Either it will work for you or it won’t. [/quote]

This + 100. The best doctor is the one best for your particular challenge + a good lab. The stats are largely meaningless. Some clinics self-select out challenging patients by pushing them to donor eggs or dropping them after a failure to keep their numbers up, some are clinics of last resort or take on challenging cases others don't -- which is often the case for university-research oriented clinics so their stats are bad, and some advertise heavily to case the easy cases such as fertilization preservation (i.e. young women wanting to freeze eggs). The stats also don't say anything about your particular case because they are general and not specific to types of diagnoses.

The best way to find the best doctor for you is to spend some time on fertility boards/Facebook groups and find the experiences of women with similar diagnoses. That's far more useful than SART stats.[/quote]

This.  The SART numbers are so easily manipulated.  You'll notice that SGF, for example, markets heavily to same-sex couples, single moms by choice, and couples with genetic illnesses who are doing IVF only for genetic screening.  These groups are great for their statistics - neither group is actually infertile.  They also push women to use DE.  A 38 year old woman with significant DOR who does not want to use a donor is going to look at their statistics and see a +/- 30% chance of success per round of IVF.  She doesn't realize that her chances are substantially lower than that, and that the 30% who achieve success likely have a much less challenging diagnosis than she does.  [/quote]

100%%%%

As someone who fell for this BS from Shady Grove they absolutely aren't honest about their success rate when you have a niche issue. Mine was recurrent pregnancy loss and they didn't actually treat the rpl so, of course, I miscarried again and almost lost my life. [/quote]

Yes! SGF was exactly who I had in mind when I stated "some advertise heavily to catch the easy cases." I started with them at 36 years old and wasted 10s of thousands of dollars and 2 years with those arrogant morons because I didn't do my research before starting treatment and fell for their BS. I didn't realize that their success rates are so high because they are a baby factory for people who don't actually have infertility. They literally put people in a spreadsheets based on hormone levels and will not deviate no matter how horribly they fail. They are horrible for DOR, and they missed sooooo much with me that other doctors picked up on DAY 1.[/quote]

Absolutely.  Take a look at the patient success section on their website: https://www.shadygrovefertility.com/resources/patient-stories/

Of the first five listed, three are obvious "easy cases" - one with PCOS, and two lesbian couples.  Another has endometriosis, which is readily addressable with IVF.  It's a scam.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics