Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Anne's Horse -- is it Better for Mitt if the Horse Wins or Loses"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]WHAT? A person has MS, gets a horse, uses riding as therapy instead of using insurance to minimize the pain of MS and you chumps inside the beltway think people will view this as a negative? Only a non-patriotic jerk would ask is it better if Rafalca losses. It is best for America for Rafalca to win and that is best for everyone. Grow a pair. [/quote]Do you think she actually rides this horse? She part owns this horse dumbass. Rafalca is not her therapy. Rafalca is a horse bred and trained beyond her means as a rider. Jan Ebeling is rafalcas rider and part owner. He picked out this horse, trains this horse, and rides this horse. Romney is the benefactor, because this sport makes almost no money even at the highest levels. I don't go for this picking on Romney for the horse, my inlaws have two dressage horses and we have one good rider. But come on, put down the Kool Aid. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
