Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Infertility Support and Discussion
Reply to "33, unexplained: Shared risk vs. multi-cycle?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I am one of the lucky ones who did shared risk that worked the first time, but we have no regrets. Having the option to recoup the majority of the expense if ivf didn't work was something we considered when making our decision. In the end, we thought it would allow us to keep our options open since I wasn't sure how many cycles of ivf I would be able to handle and was worried about miscarriage. I also didn't want to have to revisit the financial decision if we had multiple failures (ie if that were the case I could focus on whether I could handle more cycles from an emotional standpoint since the financial aspect woul have already been decided). I should add that we had been able to save the full amount before treatment, otherwise the choice would have been much more difficult. It's definitely a tough decision. I was 35, unexplained, with three failed IUIs (and one miscarriage prior to starting treatment).[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
