Reply to In defense of tear-downs in neighborhoods of elegant old homes

Forum Index » Real Estate

Reply to "In defense of tear-downs in neighborhoods of elegant old homes"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Improvements in construction materials and methods can be a good reason for a teardown, but windows are a terrible example of this. Windows are designed to be replaced, and are a small fraction of the cost of most houses.

Insulation and modern heating and cooling technologies are better examples. Its much easier to be energy efficient with new construction, and retrofitting new tech onto old houses can present real problems.

Architecture is subjective, but the bigger issue is that we should really aim to build buildings to last, and we don't always do it. Our architecture choices, construction methods, and [b]urban planning should be done with the goal that most things will still be in use in a couple hundred years[/b].[/quote]

Do you really want to live or work in a building that is 200 years old?  I doubt most people would like that.[/quote]

NP. I would, given it’s been properly maintained. I think a lot of people would. [/quote]

I would too! As long as it’s maintained — I love old buildings!

Do the PP want to tear down the White House or the Capitol? [/quote]

And Old Town Alexandria? And blocks and blocks of Brooklyn brownstones? You think nobody wants to live there, PP?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics