Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Stop the Speculations :)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] There are 2 different readers who review the application and take pretty extensive notes. Then they rate 6 components of the application - HS Rigor, Academics, Letters of Recommendation, Application Essays, Extracurricular, Test Scores. If submitted test optional, only 5 components are considered. Having no scores does not negatively impact the application, but good test scores can help. Each is subjectively scored on a scale from 1 – 5. The Common Data Set gives a hint at which factors are “very important”. • HS curriculum is the depth and breadth of classes, as it relates to the students’ individual school. A student from a high achieving HS with 20 APs who takes 3 would get a lower score than a student from a rural school that only offered 6 APs. Academics are the actual progress of grades, and are rated against the HS peers. - think percentile or rank vs the actual GPA. • Essays are moreso for the content; however, if words are misspelled or grammar is wrong the score could be lowered. The same if the “voice” seems suspect (i.e., the supplements are written too differently from the Common App essay.) The student has several essays to stand out to the reader. Also subjectively, “This student knows a lot about the school and gave specific examples on how they would fit in well here.” Or “This was not insightful. Unfortunately, I haven’t learned anything about the student other than they love soccer and I see that in the extracurriculars and awards section.” • A good Extracurriculars rating could be for working a part time job or playing a year-round sport for 4 years. They are looking for dedication not quantity. • Recommendations are scored on what the writer says about the student’s character or how they are as a student – whether they are intellectually curios or not. A LOR that merely says “ the student made straight As” which is likely evident in the transcript may not add anything to the application. • Test scores are just that. If a student scores 1350 and their school reports that score is the top of the class, that would likely be a “5”. If the students scores a 1450 and that is in the 2nd quintile of his school’s reported scores, then that student may be rated a 4 or lower. • Most AO read for a specific state/county, so they know the school/area the student is from…. So can go through a bit faster. • ALL applications are read initially; however, only about half of the applications at this specific school are competitive, so Only those go through the more detailed readings. (An example of not being competitive is if the student does not have the minimum qualifications, or is in the bottom half of their graduating class without noting mitigating circumstances.) • Also a school like MIT is strictly quantitative. They accept few people from EA because they “need” to see how the students do in Calculus. Even their athletes score a 800 on the math section of Sat 😊 After all of the ratings, the readers gives the student an overall score (not exactly an average – more holistically). It’s sort like a vote for admit (low or high) or decline. If both readers say “high admit” then the student is in. If it’s conflicting or both a low admit, the app may go to committee for a tie-breaker or end up in the “maybe” pile. Additional information may be in the file to help in case of a tie-breaker – like information from the optional interview (positive or neutral). There may also be a note on legacy, first gen, etc. (This school is trying to fill its class. Like it or not, if a legacy is on the bubble they will likely enroll over a person on the bubble with no ties to the specific school. Also, first gen is a mitigating circumstance. Like it or not, they may have only taken the SAT once in fall of Sr year because they were not aware to take it earlier. ) But nothing is assumed - this info would need to be in the LOR, additional information, or the reader’s knowledge of the area. [/quote] A friend's son who currently attends Stanford was able to request a copy of his student file which included his application with admissions comments. The process outlined above sounds similar to the ratings in his file. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics