Reply to Greater Greater Washington --- Please Explain Why They Have Obfuscated Their Donors in The 990 Schedule B Filing

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Greater Greater Washington --- Please Explain Why They Have Obfuscated Their Donors in The 990 Schedule B Filing"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So it seems like the GGW has people lurking on here to try to reply to all the complaints about bike lanes and other ill-thought out building density plans for Ward 3. They are also behind trying to stack all the ANC seats in Ward 3 and were featured in this vile tweet that shows how they really feel about their constituents: https://groups.io/g/clevelandpark/message/194850

[b]Was just looking at their 990, when I noticed that their Schedule B list of contributors is restricted. 
Can someone explain why a so-called grassroots advocacy group would want to obfuscate their donors? I have not seen that before. 
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/472738753/202243199349327214/full[/b]
[/quote]

Page 1, Line L:  They are a 501(c)(4)

"Effective May 28, 2020, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued final Treasury Regulations addressing donor disclosure requirements on Form 990, Schedule B. There are three essential takeaways for tax-exempt organizations:

In general, [b]Section 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations[/b], Section 506(c)(6) business leagues and other exempt entities that are not Section 501(c)(3)s or 527 political organizations no longer have to include donor identifying information on Form 990, Schedule B."
https://www.natlawreview.com/article/irs-releases-final-regulations-regarding-donor-disclosure-form-990-schedule-b

Does that help?
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics