Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Stabbing at The Brandywine in 4500 block Connecticut Ave. NW DC"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Here is what people need to understand about the vouncher program. A number of years ago, DC added "source of income" as a protected class in its human rights law. While there are a minority of (mostly liberal) jurisidictions which have done this over the last 15 years in order to expand affordable housing access, I would argue that "source of income" is not an immutable characteristic such as race, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, etc. and should not be given unfettered protection. But that's where we are. The reality is that while many, perhaps most, of voucher tenants are law abiding citizens of limited means, there is a subset of voucher holder tenants who exhibit severe anti-social behaviors. Their effect on a building means that gradually a building's market rate tenants---who have more economic mobility---will simply leave. The Council should revisit the scope of the "source of income" protection and be more nuanced. Landlords should do their fair share in terms of voucher acceptance but should not be required to accept vouchers ad infinitum or risk being sued. Our courts should also be far more efficient in allowing Landlords to evict tenants who are exhibiting anti-social lease violation behaviors.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics