Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Counsel for School Board Submits Brief to SCOTUS Requesting Denial of Certiorari"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]WOW. Confirmation of a lot of the facts that have been debated on this forum. It’s hard to see where the Coalition has a leg to stand on. One to 51 low income Asians is [i]staggering[/i].[/quote] OP - agreed. I have been following this case for a while and had no idea that the lawyers for the Coalition had not challenged the elimination of the exam and the application fee - and that they broadly agreed that race-neutral methods of attempting to improve representation of Black and Hispanic students would be permissible under the 14th Amendment. That latter point is in direct contrast to Judge Hilton's original ruling at the district court level. I have no idea how you can read that document without coming to the conclusion that the Coalition for TJ is deeply disingenuous about their real agenda. Verrilli was kind to only call them out about it obliquely.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
