Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Federal Performance Plan and Self Assessment"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]We just wrote our self assessments, and every year I feel stymied by the exercise. My supervisor goes over it every year line by line, so I need to be able to map my accomplishments back to my plan but the mapping feels messy. We have a broad objective like “support scientific research” (in a research scientist), and then about 30 bullet points describing various tasks like “written reports to management”, “tracking experiments”, “innovate to solve problems”, and “improve documentation and be mindful of stakeholder goals”. I’m fine with the broad objective, and am happy to write about the work I did, with experiments run, reports written, problems encountered and what I contributed to solving. But I struggle to map the reality back to the super generic and then generic and inflexible bullets. I have 5 broad objectives, so we are looking at like 150 bullets to map to. Does everyone do this? It takes me an incredible amount of time mapping things back rather than saying what I did. I would love to push back at perf plan generation stage and say “can we make this just the broad objective without the bullet points” but I feel that would not be well received. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics