Reply to Garland appoints/elevates Wiess to Special Counsel Role

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Garland appoints/elevates Wiess to Special Counsel Role"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Question.....

If Weiss has always had authority to decide when, where, and who to charge,(per Garland's comments) why does he need this status?

More important questions....

Why Weiss?  It has been demonstrated that he was ineffective in handling this case so far.  Not only through whistleblower testimony, but as evidenced by the appearance in court.

Is this to protect him from testifying before Congress?
Is this to ensure that charges will be minimal as we have seen thus far?
Is it an effort to protect Joe?

Time will tell.........[/quote]

“Per Garland’s comments” I note that you don’t recognize that Weiss himself has told congress this as well?

Special counsels still testify before Congress when requested. Both Mueller and Durham did so.[/quote]

Not during the investigation. 
And, multiple whistleblowers and witnesses have directly contradicted what Garland, and Weiss, have said.  [/quote]

The IRS witnesses leaked the investigation and have their own legal exposure, and Archer has not implicated anyone in any illegalities, but other than that, sure.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics