Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Why can’t Watkins get traction with Capitol Hill?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The boundary is too big and weirdly shaped. Most people within the boundary are closer to another school on the Hill, so they go there instead. Watkins then becomes a school for Ward 7 and 8.[/quote] The boundary is idiotic, especially when you have split campus. Families that are walking distance to Peabody for ECE are super far from Watkins. A small number of families are equidistant for both, but the shape of the boundary means this is a tiny portion of the IB community. Watkins' location is really convenient for people commuting into downtown from Wards 7 and 8. It's not convenient to a family that lives on the Hill near Peabody and wants their 2nd grader to be able to scooter or bike to school. I think DCPS (and the parents on the Hill who advocated for that gerrymandering, though those parents are long gone) really painted themselves into a corner on this one. Boundaries should probably be reallocated on the Hill but that process will be a nightmare because there is huge variety in quality and desirability of Hill elementaries. You'd have to do the entire ward, and you'll wind up with families now zoned for L-T going to Miner, or now zoned for Payne going to Watkins, or now zoned for Watkins going to Brent. People would lose their minds about some of those shifts.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics