Reply to Arlington CB - who is good for schools?

Forum Index » VA Public Schools other than FCPS

Reply to "Arlington CB - who is good for schools?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]None of them.  Based off of private conversations with her probably Coffee is the worst for schools because she doesn’t believe in trying to reign in development or have infrastructure investment (schools, roads, etc) keep pace with new development.  [/quote]

Agree with "none of them."

None of them mention schools except for Roy who pushes more community and county partnerships with schools. She is also focused on transit - although in speaking with her one-on-one, she didn't seem to grasp how the County can collaborate with schools with the bus routes and times. [b]She said that students already have the iRide program and just looked at me blankly when I tried to explain that the bus routes need to be efficient and timed to school needs for more students to actually use ART/Metro buses to go to school. She didn't seem to understand that the bus would take my kids 2 transfers and 45 minutes to an hour one way v. taking the existing school bus (10-15 minutes) or driving themselves (7 minutes)....let alone that the timing of the ART/Metro routes do not correspond with when school starts or dismisses, or extra curricular activities begin/end. [/b] She would be my first choice for schools except for her focus on getting developers to contribute more to the county's affordable housing fund - which in turn goes to AHC and APAH so they can keep adding 200+unit affordable housing buildings in the same neighborhoods and developments they already have 100% committed affordable housing....merely continuing to add to the already 65%+high FRL schools.

Droomdogle, or whatever his name is, at least mentions encouraging developers to include 10% affordable units in their housing developments which is at least a departure from all the AH advocates/CB who just want to keep building more where it already is and preserving it all forever where it currently is. This at least would "spread the wealth" of opportunity and resources a little bit by giving more low-income kids and families access to schools not already disproportionately burdened by very high FRL and high ELL needs, etc.  (It won't happen; but at least he mentions it, even though it's not in any context of schools).

Cunningham has at least been involved in some new school planning processes and has been positively viewed on her performance in that context. She also isn't pushing the increased density goals current CB has. That, in turn, helps schools when APS and the County can't/won't plan effectively long-term for school needs.

The rest of them are just for maximum density with no thought to schools or infrastructure.

[/quote]

How can anyone running for CB be so out of touch and so.... I can't even think of the best word.   We need to get rid of the density pushers without any sense of school and infrastructure needs.   The CB were the ones who said in a joint session with the SB:  "[b]There is no additional land or space for schools anywhere in the County[/b]!"  Then act like it.[/quote]

Then they proceeded to sell-back part of the Carlin Springs property from VHC to VHC. If land is so scarce, don't sell what  you already own.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics