Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Unpredictability of admission decisions "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Pretty predictable for my kid this year. Big 3. 3.8+ unweighted. Just under 1500 SAT I looked at CDS data and used adjusted acceptance rate for kid gender (male usually slightly higher acceptance rate but not always) and for one of the OOS flagships, used acceptance rate they publish for kids with less than 5 AP because our school dropped AP courses and honors don’t count. Accepted at 54% 48% 34% will likely attend 30% state flagship OOS < 5 AP WL at 44% seemed like a yield protect to me 20.8% state flagship OOS < 5AP 17.3% 14.2% 12% legacy Rejected at 26% 11.5% 4.8% state flagship OOS no AP rate 4.3% state flagship OOS no AP rate 4.2% 4% legacy 2.9% state flagship OOS no AP rate I haven’t yet put kid GPA into the Harvard-westlake data but I’m guessing would be also similar. I wish I had done more of this when list was being formed. Our school doesn’t give scattergrams to kids or parents and generally shuns data driven list formation. They make it all about kid “feels” I would have had kid do more in the 30-60 percent weighted accordance range for kid gender based on CDS [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics