Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Elrich vetoes controversial planning board member"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I could be wrong about this, but I believe the process now is if the county wishes to override this, they need a unanimous vote, no?[/quote] No. 9 votes. [/quote] Ah, thanks. So they need 9 out of 11. 3 of whom voted for another candidate (not Hendrick, forget his or her name). Will be interesting to see if they vote as a bloc, to show Elrich, or if they use this as an opportunity to re-open the door for the other person. [/quote] Right, 8 councilmembers voted for James Hedrick, 3 councilmembers (Jawando, Mink, Sayles) voted for Cherri Branson. If I were a councilmember, I would vote to override Elrich's veto if for no other reason than to assert the county council's prerogative over the county executive to appoint the Planning Board commissioners, but I am not a councilmember, so who knows?[/quote] Yep, thats certainly one consideration. Or maybe there will be some insider horse trading like Jawando and Mink agree to back Hendrick and override the veto, if they get support on their STEP act. Or another councilmember agrees in exchange for a vote on one of the two competing rent control proposals. Interesting stuff. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics