Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "What are the “Big 3” or “Big 5” in Baltimore?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Things have shifted a bit over the years. Friends isn't quite the academic powerhouse it was 25 years ago, having priced themselves out of a highly educated but not highly paid demographic that now mostly goes to public schools. Even Park has slipped in that sense. While schools like Gilman and Bryn Mawr had a long history among socially prominent Baltimoreans, even that has changed greatly in the last decade. I'd rank the schools as follows - [b]strictly by academic outcome as measured in college placements[/b], NOT in any sense of superiority, AND it's because the schools get the kids more likely to go to an Ivy, NOT because the schools are able to turn a dullard into an Ivy bound student. Tier 1: Gilman, Bryn Mawr, McDonogh Tier 2: Everyone else. [/quote] This is highly debatable. Gilman generally draws a fairly elite crowd, and many of its students get into top schools but that also comes from the fact that the school has a lot of Ivy legacy parents and a lot of kids who apply ED and for whom money is no object. I will say this: I coached boys in the Baltimore area for years on various sports teams, and the ones from Gilman were the most entitled and worst behaved. There is a huge range of schools in Baltimore, and for example Park is very different than NDP, and Boys Latin is very different from Gilman or Calvert Hall. One can be perfect for one child and terrible for the same child. [/quote] The old money Baltimore Calvert --> Gilman --> Princeton pipeline doesn't exist any more. The term socially prominent is probably misleading, a term that had more resonance prior to the 1970s even if it lingered into the 80s and 90s. But you'd be correct that the professional elite, the premier doctors at Hopkins, the Legg Mason/T Row Price managers, would still prioritize Gilman. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics