Reply to Field hockey clubs feedback

Forum Index » Sports General Discussion

Reply to "Field hockey clubs feedback "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]10:46 gives a pretty good summary. I’ll add a bit.

Next Level- I know a family there who says it is not as competitive as they would like. I’ve also heard it’s getting too big and some things are falling though the cracks. Coaching is good, but they are not necessarily concerned with winning according to a family I know on the team. So playing time is more equal, which is likely why they are not as competitive as they could be.

Freedom - I know a family here who likes the coaching her daughter gets on a top team. They feel the club is too big and the location is not great for them. I know a few families left once they merged with Spark because practice moved north and the club got too big.

Wolves - I agree with the above poster. They are growing stronger. Gloria is great. I’ve heard she doesn’t support the need for strength and conditioning, which is a concern for some.

Alpha - I find the male coach to be a huge turnoff. He is so loud and obnoxious. Level of play is average for this area.

Warhawks - we considered Warhawks but their location is not great for us. I liked what I heard about recruiting support and coaching philosophy. I’ve heard it’s not perfect, though from some families on the team.

Husel - many feel their coach is crazy because of how she is on the sidelines. Some see it as passionate. More competitive than Alpha but still not top tier for this area.

Missing from your list is Hammers, Mustangs, and Metro. Not sure if that is on purpose.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics