Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Equity report recommendations on GBRS"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]TBH, the equity people came across as a bit clueless. And contradictory.[/quote] A lot of the recommendations have been or are in the process of being implemented. Local norms, more LLV programs; WISC seems to matter less; NNAT has been deemed nearly moot at this point. But GBRS recommendation appears to have fallen on deaf ears. It strikes me as odd that such an objectively flawed metric would count for so much. [/quote] The thing is, the equity report says that gifted programs have value and then gives recommendations on how to make something that is not a gifted program. And FCPS, which in the administration has a love-hate relationship with AAP, was eager to implement as many of the recommendations as possible. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
