Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "Binance and FTX"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm not into the crypto scene and am fascinated to see that much of the drama/manipulation/crimes are related to the platform companies and not the digital currencies themselves. Illegal? These are not banks and are almost completely unregulated. I don't know what it was take for some to be prosecuted as a crime.[/quote] Agree, and my work prohibits any ownership of crypto. Bitcoin's proof of work mechanism ensures its integrity. Etherium has shifted to proof of stake to satisfy the climate change crowd but it remains to be seen if that could be manipulated. Lightly regulated platforms dealing with other people's money were a problem waiting to happen. FTX was lending customer assets (an exchange should be safekeeping customer assets, not lending them) to a connected company, Alameda (compounding the egregiousness of the lending), that Alameda collateralized with its holdings of tokens FTX itself had issued (ensuring that a drop in the token's value would leave FTX unable financially to give its customers their assets back). The FTX implosion has nothing to do with the digital assets themselves, but has everything to do with a financial firm that avoided all principles of good governance and risk management. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics