Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Arlington County Board - 3 days out and still undecided"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]About me: Really don't have strong feelings about MMH. Super-large SFHs have already negatively impacted flooding, lack of diversity, on-street parking ([b]because people who can afford these homes often have more cars than they do drivers[/b]), so I see the damage as being done, regardless of whether these large houses have one family or 4. If Vihstadt or someone similar were on the ballot, I would vote for that person because I think we need alternative voices on the board. I'm not sure Clement's voice is anything other than a naysayer. And Theo is a non-starter for other reasons. My understanding is that de Ferranti has made statements indicating he supports compromise, at least on MMH. But who is behind all those homemade signs accusing him of dishonesty? I guess I'm currently leaning toward MDF, but I do want to send the message that the CB does not have carte blanche and needs to listen to constituents.[/quote] Uhhhh, lower income Hispanics live with 3 or 4 genrations and they all have cars. Drive around South Arlington and look at the 1300sqf houses with 6 cars out front.[/quote] Yet MM say there will be a half parking space per unit because people use bikes rather than cars [/quote] They reduced the parking minimum because of complaints about the tree canopy. The board does listen and in this case responded to a complaint that wasn’t genuine. Opponents should be honest about why they oppose MMH. It’s not affordability or the tree canopy. It’s a feeling of ownership over publicly owned property (street parking) and concern about property values. Now you’ll respond and say property values will rise faster with MMH and maybe they will, on average. But opponents aren’t concerned about average property values, they’re worried about the value of their specific lot and concerned that a duplex next door will decrease the value of their home relative to a SFH without MMH next door. [/quote] Who are you to demand that they reveal their finacial concerns to?[/quote] The poster sounds like one of the YIMBYs whobtried to take over a community conversation I attended on missing middle housing. When someone raised a concern, he accused them of living on illegal land, racism, greed, and being selfish for being more concerned about their money then the refugees from Arlington. It was the greatest demonstration of projection until I saw Trevor Noah try to claim that Brits were appalled that Rishni Sunak became prime minister. He was trying to project America’s racism on the British just as the YIMBYs are trying to project their financial motives on owners of single family homes. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics