Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Diet, Nutrition & Weight Loss
Reply to "When is your heart rate too high on a treadmill? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Max heart rate is not really a scientifically based thing. [quote] THE SURPRISING HISTORY OF THE "HRmax=220 -age" EQUATION. Robert A. Robergs, Roberto Landwehr. JEPonline. 2002;5(2):1-10. The estimation of maximal heart rate (HRmax) has been a feature of exercise physiology and related applied sciences since the late 1930's. The estimation of HRmax has been largely based on the formula; HRmax=220-age. This equation is often presented in textbooks without explanation or citation to original research. In addition, the formula and related concepts are included in most certification exams within sports medicine, exercise physiology, and fitness. [b]Despite the acceptance of this formula, research spanning more than two decades reveals the large error inherent in the estimation of HRmax ([/b]Sxy=7-11 b/min). Ironically, inquiry into the history of this formula reveals that it was not developed from original research, but resulted from observation based on data from approximately 11 references consisting of published research or unpublished scientific compilations. [b]Consequently, the formula HRmax=220 -age has no scientific merit for use in exercise physiology and related fields. [/b]A brief review of alternate HRmax prediction formula reveals that the majority of age -based univariate prediction equations also have large prediction errors (>10 b/min). Clearly, more research of HRmax needs to be done using a multivariate model, and equations may need to be developed that are population (fitness, health status, age, exercise mode) specific.[/quote] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237258265_The_surprising_history_of_the_HRmax220-age_equation[/quote] It's a rough rule of thumb, and there are newer formulas that may be more accurate. However, max heart is definitely a thing, it's just a matter of how to accurately estimate it. [/quote] Too bad science does not back you up. [/quote] Too bad you don't understand science. The quote you provided doesn't state that maximum heart rate doesn't exist. It absolutely does exist. It only calls into question the rough rule of thumb of 220 - age. I didn't disagree with you on that. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics