Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "MoCo Council candidate Natali Fani-Gonzalez under review for possible tax evasion"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]A supervisor at the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation has confirmed that the property tax account for County Council candidate Natali Fani-Gonzalez and her husband, Angel Gonzalez, is under review for illegal receipt of 100% tax exemption following a greatly exaggerated military disability claim. https://parentscoalitionmc.blogspot.com/2022/10/pcmc-exclusive-county-council-candidate.html?m=1[/quote] The person who wrote this understands very little about VA disability. A veteran can be 100% without being "so disabled that he or she requires round-the-clock care to stay alive." In addition, a veteran can have a 100% rating and still be able to ride a bicycle - ratings include psychological disabilities, brain injuries, and many other things that might not prevent physical activity even with a 100% rating. There can also be a combined 100% rating from multiple disabilities. The excerpts from the court decision don't include his overall rating and therefore may not be relevant. This sounds potentially bad, but it's hard to trust anything this article says. [/quote] Sorry but you’re just making a lot of assumptions and gross misrepresentations. A 100% rating is a severe disability. To qualify a TBI or psychological/psychiatric disability as 100% requires prior hospitalization and a pretty serious diagnosis that would prevent someone from ever being considered a productive worker. [/quote] I also never said that 100% isn't severe. You can also have a 100% psych disability without a prior hospitalization, although the symptoms for a 100% rating are very severe. What "gross misrepresentation" did I make? The article had many things that are incorrect that I pointed out. There are some people with 100% ratings who can ride a bike. Many other couldn't.[/quote] As a Vet you are not going to get a 100% psychological disability without the level of severity that necessitates hospitalization. Maybe you were unlucky not to get inpatient treatment. But back to the topic at hand, the candidate can clear all of this up with some transparency and disclosure. Why won’t she?[/quote] Yeah, you are right that this could easily be cleared up. [/quote] Instead of clearing it up she feigns indignity and unsuccessfully tries to present as a victim. She’s really bad at this and her thread reeks of someone caught red handed. [twitter]https://twitter.com/NataliFGonzalez/status/1583081968933429249[/twitter][/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics