Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]No way it magically went away, right...RIGHT??? :) [/quote] Of course not. In some cases school systems are doubling down on their commitment to “equity,” which is effectively CRT is practice. This battle over the future of our schools and nation will play out for years to come - namely, is the goal to provide equal opportunity or to radically redistribute private wealth and societal resources to certain groups (principally ADOS) with the illusory goal of promoting equal outcomes.[/quote] No school system is doing that or else you'd hear about it, sweetie. Fox would cover it like a fly on shit. OP meant that [b]there was never any CRT to begin with[/b]. You got played, its okay. [/quote] +1 CRT actually refers to a real legal theory about the ways that facially neutral laws could have different effects on different groups of people because of the way that racism shapes the system, not just the individual. It is not, and has never been taught in grade school. Some people used it to mean "teaching American history in a way that includes bad stuff white people did," which is just...history. (The reason they picked that particular term was because originally they tried to tie it to Marxist critical theory, which is something else entirely.) [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics