Reply to Are the NESCACs worth the money?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Are the NESCACs worth the money?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]NECSAC is an athletic conference of 11 schools of differing levels of excellence.   The best NECSAC schools offer some of the best undergraduate education in the US.   Let's momentarily set aside the USNWR ranking that stupidly splits universities and colleges into two lists, and temporarily ignore the ill-informed chatter of its DCUM groupies.   The (better) WSJ ranking system places the top six NESCAC schools (Amherst, Williams, Tufts, Bowdoin, Middlebury, Wesleyan) among the top 50 in the nation.   The others NECSACs aren't quite as highly ranked, with Trinity (104) and Connecticut (109) although fine bringing up the rear.

Obviously for NECSAC -- just as for Ivy or Big Ten or State U -- the finances have to work (and if $ is a concern, you'll probably want to major in something a little more marketable than say gender studies).  But it's not like a NECSAC education is a lesser product that's only attractive at a discounted rate.  That one even feels the need to explain that about extraordinary colleges like Williams or Amherst is just further evidence of the general uselessness of DCUM's received wisdom.

The best NECSAC schools will be (well-) known to employers, and grad schools.  They may not be as well known to your father's second cousin or your grandmother's neighbor back in the old country, though, so if impressing them is a top priority and determinant of "worth the money," better to go to some huge university where a few professors have Nobel prizes and you need binoculars to see from the back of the lecture hall.           [/quote]

For a similar and less expensive experience, consider other LACs such as e.g. Oberlin, Grinnell, Denison, College of Wooster, Allegheny.

~NESCAC alum whose DCs had better experiences at other non-NESCAC LACs[/quote]
What’s with the bizarre Wall Street ranking plug?

Its mention, though, smacks of a good litmus test: if you are the type of person/family who thinks going to #23 Williams on that there ranking is even close to equivalent to going to, say, #19 Emory, do not — and I repeat do not — go the NESCAC route. It is just not for you. No need to discuss it or debate it further.

If, however, you are of the ilk who think Williams is superior to Emory, so much so that even comparing the two is silly (let alone ranking Williams lower), then the NESCAC’s, even the lower NESCAC’s, are indeed for you. This isn’t really a discussion issue: these are two different types of people. You know who you are, and that won’t change.

In the off chance you do not know who you are, and think this merits further discussion, my advice is not to bother: do not go the NESCAC route. So-called national universities are the default group now; enjoy your default status.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics