Reply to Demonstrated Interest (DI) vs Likelihood to Enroll (LTE)

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Demonstrated Interest (DI) vs Likelihood to Enroll (LTE)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]These programs/consulting firms are very expensive and many schools can't afford them. [/quote]

"According to a 2015 Educause Survey, over 75% of colleges and universities use analytics for enrollment management, up from just over 60% in 2012, making it the most common form of data analytics in higher education."

https://www.brookings.edu/research/enrollment-algorithms-are-contributing-to-the-crises-of-higher-education/[/quote]

+1 I am a professor at an R1 public. Last year, I attended an admissions committee meeting with a vendor, Slate, which seems to be one of the dominant companies in the industry. I can't provide a link but the current percentage of US colleges and universities that use analytics for enrollment management is now 85%. However, many schools still use the essential features to manage applications. I noted that from the list of R1's and top 100 schools, all use enrollment management software AND data mining algorithms to determine yield and LTE.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics