Reply to ccrm lone tree

Forum Index » Infertility Support and Discussion

Reply to "ccrm lone tree"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I used Ccrm lone tree before nova was an option.  I found the process super overwhelming and had failed with two other local doctors, which is why we made the jump.  The monitoring was done locally (not Ccrm) but difficult to navigate. I had to go out there twice - and stay for 2 weeks one time. And so much paperwork.   BUT, they were the only dr who were able to produce embryos (which I miscarried).

That all being said, when nova opened up, i started seeing dr. Payson, who is AMAZING.  He also says it’s not about the dr you see, it’s about the lab, and the lab procedures here vs . Lt are the same. He also thinks air quality of the lab is super important, and the air quality in the Tyson’s lab is better even than lt. I would just do it here and not bother with Colorado. [/quote]

Understand where you're coming from, but I'm hesitant to take their word for it - their SART data is way lower than Lone Trees:

Nova: https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=2000064

Lone Tree: https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=1902#patient-cumulative

Perhaps they're getting to lone tree's levels soon but it will take some time.  And it could be because Lone Tree is more selective, however most of their patients seek them out after failures elsewhere.

I'm not trying to argue with what you said... as I'm thinking out loud, am thinking if we do pull the trigger it will be with Lone Tree (inconvenience and all) so we can be sure we're going with the best, for peace of mind.

Sigh.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics