Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Cars and Transportation
Reply to "Geico ordered to pay $5.2 to a lady who caught an STD via car sex"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This mid characterized the proceeding. It was an arbitration between the two individuals to which GEICO was not a party. In fact, GEICO seemingly was not even made aware of the arbitration under after the award. Even if the woman may meet the technical fevenituon of “covered person” ondoffarvas she occupied the vehicle, I see no reasonable basis for imposing a duty to indemnify for the alleged “loss” in the absence of a covered “accident.”[/quote] Geico was sent a demand letter and declined to defend their insured. [/quote] Although there are differences between policies and states there’s generally no duty to defend under circumstances where coverage is unambiguously excluded, as it would seem to be here. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
