Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Innocence is not enough (Shinn v. Ramirez)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Ruling is spot on. Based on a law congress passed. They could undue this right away and Biden would sign. But the issue here is when you present the evidence. You need to do it in your state appeal. If you don’t it is waived in federal court which is literally what the law says that congress passed. Do you do get to raise it. But it needs to be done at state level or waived. [/quote] The problem is that this defendant had incompetent counsel. His lawyer did file the proper paperwork. There is credible evidence that he's innocent. The court is basically saying if the state screws up. They are allowed to carry on business as usual. This is leading us down a road where the federal courts are irrelevant and there is just a patchwork of state laws. This is incredibly damaging in the long run.[/quote] Right but Congress passed a law that said this. There is no exception. Courts cannot make one up. This is a Congress issue not a court issue.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics