Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "options for an academically advanced elem kid in down county Montgomery"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]K is mainly about the social adjustment to school, and less about jumpstarting little Johnny into calculus. Kids come into K with vastly different abilities and my experience so far is that MCPS (or at least our school) does a great job of cultivating a wide range. And many of the K students who were light years ahead of my child two years ago are not any more. This is presumably why they don't start the gifted programs until a few years in - the early years see a lot of change. [/quote] I'm the PPwhose daughter has made progress on social skills but not much else. I am not trying to be argumentative, I say that because online communication doesn't carry tone of voice or facial expression. I honestly wonder, and the answer could be yes, no, or maybe, if the reason the playing field is eventually leveled is because the kids who come in ahead do not have the same opportunities for growth. I don't have a solution when it's 2 out of 20. You can't individualize every child's education in our system at that age (well, a teacher might be able to but then they'd have no personal life because it would take an insane amount of time). Two scenarios ... 1) you have grade level benchmarks and kids who come in at the high end and reach them early just explore around in that area. Kids who come in at the Lowe end make a lot of progress. All end up in a similar place. 2) you have a progressive scale ... Regardless of where you come in, you are expected to make progress within a range each year. This would be instead of reading by level z by the end of grade y, you are expected to progress 3-5 (or whatever) number of reading levels each year, with a minimum level of z b the end of grade y. I wonder if the difference in performance at K would remain constant, but the gap would close for some, if the kids who come in at the high end had the same room to grow. Does that make sense? I don't know that it's necessarily the case. I'm not an expert, I'm just wondering aloud (and on DCUM, where that can sometimes get treacherous ; ) )[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics