Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "U9 reevaluated at U16"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Every year We hear abut the coaches choosing size and speed over the smaller kid who is technically strong. If you fast forward to U16. You will find that that coaches were more right than wrong. Yes there are the smaller kids who have outworked the majority to be technically much better. The small kids who are finally hitting their growth spurs and catching up. For the most part the bigger, faster, more athletic kids are still making up the majority of the top rosters. Far to often at U16 you have the same parents that were back at U9 advocating for the smaller kids still preaching the same things. The smaller kid is more technically sound or he's a late grower. The truth is even though that smaller less athletic kid usually is more technically sound. They haven't developed enough to separate themselves to be more valuable than the bigger faster kids. Very few have have gotten so technically better that its enough to overlook the size and athleticism. I think many times that bigger faster kid movs on to other sports opening up roster spots for those smaller kids leading even more credence to the fact most of the time back at U9 or U10 the coaches get it right. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics