Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Infertility Support and Discussion
Reply to "Does waiting one year really have that big of an effect?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]PP again. Forgot to add I was 33 when we started IUIs, 34 when I did my first IVF cycle, and eventually had kids at 36 and 38. [b]The age of 35 is not the end of your fertility.[/b][/quote] I mean, 33 was the end of MY fertility, so I don’t think this trope is particularly helpful or accurate on an infertility board. [/quote] Np but I think the 35 as end of fertility "trope" is perfectly appropriate here. Clearly 35 wasn't yours, nor mine, nor is it likely to be the OP's. We're all "special cases" here, making a particular year even more meaningless as a fertility reference point. So if op was inclined to revert back to 35 as some sort of threshold or milestone this was a good reminder that it's particularly arbitrary.[/quote] Which is why the initial question is important - it really depends on OP’s diagnosis. But she certainly doesn’t need reassurance that it’s definitely NBD, because it very may well be.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
