Reply to Occupy Newt's Brain

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Occupy Newt's Brain"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=TheManWithAUsername][quote=takoma]But, in essence, the argument is that it is reasonable that the prime directive is investor profit, not productivity, and certainly not worker welfare.[/quote]
Corporate amorality: it's not just a good idea; it's the law!

I mention this a lot b/c even most on the left forget this key point. No one is really arguing for corporations to care about nothing other than profit, b/c they won that argument long ago. For-profit corporations must consider no end other than shareholder profits. They are enormous amoral creatures that we create and set loose in our economy, and give Constitutional rights to boot.[/quote]

This isn't true at all, actually.  Corporate directors have extremely wide latitude to manage their business as they see fit under the "business judgment" rule.  That's hornbook corporate law.  There is simply no legal requirement that "For-profit corporations must consider no end other than shareholder profits."   To be sure, this is not unlimited--if say Exxon decided to sell all of its assets and give the money to charity, it would be illegal--but that is a far cry from saying that corporations are legally required to act in amoral ways  That is not so.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics