Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "clarifying the term "creative destruction" (a rant)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I just watched the whole King of Bain movie (highly recommended, because in addition to the standard LBO stories it documents Bain profiting from the type of market manipulation typical of the Internet bubble, with analysts hyping up to the public stock that they had huge reservations about in private). In it they also talk about Romney's devotion to the quintessential capitalist idea of "creative destruction" as the motivation behind his Bain career and I beg to differ. In B-school lingo, creative destruction is a buzzword thrown around to describe the traditional life cycle of a business or a sector of the economy. An entrepreneur comes up with a great idea (say, the ice-box in the late 19th century), starts a company, which attracts imitators, and pretty soon a whole industry is born, grows and reaches a plateau (maturity/saturation stage) when lots and lots of people own ice-boxes. Then a smart Alec comes along and invents the refrigerator, and as people progressively switch, the refrigerator industry takes off while the ice-box industry declines and dies off in the absence of ridiculous government interference motivated by special interests to prop it up. While this does involve job losses in the ice-box industry, they are gradual and many come about through attrition, as younger and more mobile workers join the more promising industry rather than the declining one. In this scenario, the world gets richer through technological progress which increases productivity and in turn creates jobs and wealth. Bain's activities have never had anything to do with creative destruction other than creatively thinking of ways of destroying people's lives to enrich the firm. While they may have increased productivity in some cases through consolidation of less efficient companies, this is offset by the devastation to entire communities of companies that were dismembered and/or saddled with debt. Any wealth that was created and most of the wealth tranferred was transferred to a few individuals at the top echelons. There are capitalists who create jobs and then there are vultures. For Romney to parade as the apostle of creative destruction is akin to ambulance chasers claiming they are defending the constitution.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics