Reply to It's Hard to Take You Seriously

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "It's Hard to Take You Seriously"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]With a straight face you have defended the candidacies of Palin, Bachmann, Cain, and Perry, despite their obvious lack of basic knowledge about the Presidency/Vice Presidency and the subjects those jobs entail.  Never in a million years would you find the Dems doing this.  Remember Howard Dean?  He brought the crazy on one speech (one speech!) and he was out.  Al Sharpton couldn't with the District even when the major candidates did not enter the primary there.

[b]We have a minimum standard.[/b]  You apparently do not.  You'd like to talk about candidates' knowledge and brain power the way hippie parents talk about "multiple intelligences" - like the "everybody is a winner" mentality.  I'm here to tell you that not everyone is a winner, and some of your candidates are dumb as stumps.  Can you develop a filter for that before you embarrass yourselves again?[/quote]

2 words: John Edwards[/quote] Edwards could talk about politics without embarrassing himself, which is the point of this post.

If you find fault with candidates who cheat on their wives while they have cancer, you might want to take another look at your current list of candidates.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics