Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Bowser is testifying again in favor of statehood, while DC govt dissembles on statehood costs"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]In 1889 & 1890, Republicans added North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Washington, Idaho, & Wyoming – dividing a sparsely populated Dakota territory for more electoral power. The outrage today is at best, hypocritical.[/quote] So does this mean that we could divide into multiple states? I'd reconsider statehood, if Ward 3 could become its own state.[/quote] So many ignorant things to say to you. Let Ward 3 be its own state. If you ever left Ward 3, you would know that you are getting the prized ward.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
