Reply to Last week's Parenthood episode (spoiler alert)

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Last week's Parenthood episode (spoiler alert)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]yes, it was unrealistic. even more unrealistic and poorly written is the whole adam/rachel/christina plotline. i am starting to be so disappointed in the show...[/quote]

Seriously, Christina...Your DH is kissed by a 'ho so you say you're going back to work in a huff? And so working is punishing your DH, somehow? And then Max is "set adrift" because Christina is working? Oooh boy. I am really neutral on the sahm/wohm thing and can't believe the plot line is playing out this way. And ALSO Julia Braverman is a Scientologist in REAL LIFE. Did you how she reacted when coffee cart/preggo and boyfriend were asking her to bend the rules for adoption? Totally wack scientology reaction. Is that the whole ethos of this show? I wonder....could be why the show is spinning out on "Cruise control".[/quote]

Wait, what?  PP, what are you smoking?  Just because the actress who plays Julia Braverman is a scientologist, that has nothing to do with the way the character Julia reacted to being asked to pay for the baby. She reacted the same way any normal, ethical, decent person who thought they were being given the gift of an adopted baby would: with complete shock and disappointment!   If that's a wacked out-scientologist reaction, then sign this Jew up for the church.   :roll: [/quote]

Although, I also don't understand that storyline.  Is this chick really going to just hand over the baby since Julia and her hubby are paying medical bills?  How can they NOT afford an adoption?  Not saying I think adoptions are cheap, just that they don't seem to be hurting for money.  Did I miss something?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics