Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "Grass vs Turf"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]it's not just the maintenance cost of grass, it's the field availability. Our club has really nice grass and turf fields, the turf is always available. If it's raining or has recently rained, the grass is not. The turf can host games or practices back to back all day, the grass would be destroyed by that schedule [/quote] You're not really answering the question. The Strikers can obviously afford to have west creek lie dormant when it's too wet to play on. Most clubs in the NoVA are do not even have the choice. They have their county allocation of a turf field and that's it. There is neither the space for this luxury, nor the money at the clubs to pay for it. That is the question. Why are the strikers so fortunate? Is it revenue from many years of Jefferson Cup registrations?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
