Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Interesting twist on DC "density argument" - Metro ridership continues to plummet"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Density advocates base their platform on building out around DC metro stations, and invariably seek height + zoning exceptions as seen in the yet to be approved comp plan they've put forth. Except Metro ridership is down 88% since last year according to today's Post. Meanwhile, bus ridership, a wonderful web that blankets the DMV is up and WMATA is shifting resources there. This dramatic shift is obviously Covid and work from home influenced, although we have seen Metro use trending down for a long time due to maintenance and safety concerns. Thus, we should expect to see some permanent changes in DC residents' commuting preferences. While Metro is handy and should be supported, more reliance on bus and other means may become more typical. Do we correspondingly have the wrong focus in the development argument in centering new builds all around Metro hubs, when the emerging preference appears to be great bus service and other lifestyle options? Thoughtful and organic development could really happen anywhere in 3 quadrants of the city that is near an efficient bus line. There could be more effort put by the city into "connecting" SE to the rest of the city by better transport, with thoughtful + equitable development there as well. And density advocates could shift their attention to building around Metro stations in the suburbs where Metro makes sense for a longer commute (if those suburban residents support it of course. They may prefer expanded kiss and ride options with shuttles and the like). 88% plunge in Metro ridership is a significant trend. It would seem like arrogance for current densification rhetoric to not acknowledge the tension and contradictions between this statistic and their current proposals for long term changes.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics