Reply to What’s the controversy with 1) Maggie Haberman; 2) Nate Silver and 3) Dionne Warwick?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "What’s the controversy with 1) Maggie Haberman; 2) Nate Silver and 3) Dionne Warwick?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]PPl pissed at Nate Silver for acting like a contagious disease epidemiologist and he's not...and did a  lot of science wrong.[/quote]

Except the contagious disease epidemiologists in question who wrote the report were not acting like all epidemiologists would per se when they recommended not putting elderly folks first in the next phase, which would increase the number of predicted deaths. Looks like the CDC is now recommending they are put first, so those experts seem more in line with the Nate Silver perspective, which seems the more ethical perspective. Questioning experts is called critical thinking. Experts are all operating under various influences and can come to different conclusions. Good for Nate Silver. We need more critical thinking, not less.[/quote]
I don’t understand where this line of thinking is coming from? Every recommendation I saw, prior to the CDC weighing in, was frontline health workers first, then the elderly.[/quote]

Frontline health workers are already in line in the first phase, along with nursing home residents.  This is for the second step.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics