Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Beauty and Fashion
Reply to "Is this LV handbag terribly out of style?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The combination of the shape and the LV logo just reads tacky to me, sorry OP. I’m not sure why. For some reason I don’t dislike the neverfulls as much, maybe it’s the understanding that it’s such a practical workhorse type bag—which a bowling bag just isn’t—that makes me “forgive” the tackiness of the logo. But if you like it, it’s really a classic shape so it’s definitely not out of style. I guess just not my taste, not that I could afford it anyway. [/quote] Odd that you have such a strong negative opinion on a product you can't afford nor own. Neverfull is not a classic bag, it just screams I'm trying hard and broke. OP your bag looks like an Alma. It is classic style bag. If you like it, definitely use it. [/quote] It’s not a strong negative opinion, just an opinion that A) OP asked for and B) to which i’m entitled even if I can’t afford any LV bag. I have a negative opinion of Range Rovers too and I definitely can’t afford one of those. I simply associate the LV pattern, which is as close to objectively ugly as you can get, with tacky try-hard people. At least the neverfull is practical and can take a beating so I get why you’d choose it for a daily driver tote. Why you’d choose that ugly logo pattern and the tacky striver associations for a small satchel makes less sense to me. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics