Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "Mclean boundary changes - can someone please update?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]They posted the additional materials from last night here: https://www.fcps.edu/about-fcps/facilities-planning-future/school-boundary-adjustments/mclean-high-school-proposed Some key points: * They are still soliciting feedback. They could recommend a boundary change or no change. * If they redistrict to Langley, they will redistrict to Cooper at the same time. * They would phase in with rising 7th and 9th graders and grandfather existing students. * Four options were presented: - Option 1: Move the portion of Colvin Run currently assigned to Longfellow/McLean to Cooper/Langley - moves the least # of kids of Options 1-3 - Option 2: Move the portion of Colvin Run and the part of Spring Hill in Vienna (but not Tysons) currently assigned to Longfellow/McLean to Cooper/Langley - moves more kids that Option 1 - Option 3: Move the portion of Spring Hill currently assigned to Longfellow/McLean (both in Vienna and Tysons) to Cooper/Langley - moves the most kids of Options 1-3. - Option 4: No change (predicated on treating the modular addition to McLean as additional capacity, in which case they would project significantly reduced overcrowding at McLean in the future). * Options 1 and 2 only move single-family neighborhoods to Langley; Option 3 would move both SFHs and apartments in the Spring Hill ES district to Langley * Their projections do not take into account whether Langley and McLean would pick up additional kids if there is a change in TJ admissions policy to region-based admissions. * The goal is to make a decision that they would begin to implement in the fall of 2021. * There were vague references to a new task force to look at growth occurring around Tysons, with the suggestion this might support a permanent addition at McLean, but no promises or commitments. * Multiple School Board members (Tholen, Frisch, Sizemore Heizer, Omeish, and Cohen) sat in on the presentation; not sure if Keys Gamarra did even though she is also an at-large member. * They collected and may post feedback from breakout groups collected during the presentation; you can continue to submit comments at McLeanBoundary@fcps.edu. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics