Reply to Article on TJ student

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "Article on TJ student"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The TJ student has made it very clear she is in favor of the lottery.

People who claim you should read her story, but then reject what she's fighting for, are trying to have their cake and eat it, too.  [/quote]

You can empathize with a person's plight but also not agree with their solution.  Why is the lottery the only solution?

How about finding other means of increasing URM representation?

Off the top of my head you could go with Superintendent's plan to pick a group of 100 students factoring SES, sending school, and ESL.

Then pick the rest of the students using the old system.

That should get you increased URM representation without the need for a lottery.

Why is a lottery seen as a holy grail?[/quote]

In part because it fully avoids the creation of a new two-track student body at TJ.  There is obviously already enough crap going on about who does and doesn't "belong" at TJ.  The 100/400 proposal would not solve that problem, and we all know that Student 401 from Carson will file a lawsuit claiming he should be at TJ rather than Student 1-100.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics