Reply to Is it worth doing ivf if I am able to have a chemical pregnancy?

Forum Index » Infertility Support and Discussion

Reply to "Is it worth doing ivf if I am able to have a chemical pregnancy?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don’t think I consider what you experienced proof of “I can get pregnant” either. I really don’t mean that unkindly, but from my experiences, few REs are going to consider it as so either.

Do the testing. If there’s diminished ovarian reserve or sperm issues, I would probably skip right to IVF. If everything looks good or relatively “solveable” with clomid/femara, I would do a couple IUIs. But also remember that IVF is rarely a one month process. You’ll probably be scheduling it at least 2, possibly 3 months out. Everything takes longer than you would expect and if you want two or more kids, doing it now will most definitely be better than trying to do it later (we did our first IVF at 31 and had great success without even doing PGS testing)[/quote]
I’m not sure why PP said that’s not proof that you can get pregnant, because a positive pregnancy test two days in a row is, in fact, proof that you can get pregnant. Stay pregnant? I’m not sure, but it’s worth informing the doctor. I wouldn’t go forward with the tests but I wouldn’t do IVF yet if they came back good.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics